the right to privacy can be a protection for the individual from authoritarian abuse, and at the same time can provide fertile grounds for the establishment of authoritarian abuse. we have to reassess where privacy actually matters and where does protection have a positive impact on all individuals while not empowering abusive authoritarian endeavours.intellectual property can be seen as protection of ones creation, or the principal gate keeping of capitalistic powers, as the enforcement of such rights is largely defined by the purse of the one that should be protected by it.if one needs to keep the illusion that one alone is responsible for their invention, we could make IP courts to be a public service free for all. if we want to presume we’re living in a democracy, well at least democratize access to the rights we granted each of us.if one can see, beyond the misconception of intellectual property, you understood that invention, novelty of thought, has always been a phenomenon, misterious in it’s inception, influenced by numerous thinking minds across time and space which finds a final messenger who then communicates it, at the right time and space.